Jump to content
passwords have all been force reset. please recover password to reset ×
MFGamers

Films II : The Filminator


Bob
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, shinymcshine said:

 

I'm still not sure - noting I've not played the recent remasters, but the essence of the survival horror in the original RE 1 & 2 felt more about never quite having enough ammo & hardware, and avoiding/running away from unnecessary combat, as the vulnerability added to the tension - whilst that trailer seems all about spraying ammo & big explosions.

 

Only if you're bad at them.

 

That reputation that early RE games have is totally overstated.  A first play through can feel like that or harder difficulties but there's also Jill's grenade launcher, giant mutant plants you need a flamethrower for and the finale always being the big bad getting rocketed.

 

It's schlock and that's what the film looks like too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watched No Time to Die in the cinema today. Glad I watched it in the cinema. It looks specular and would be a lot less engaging on a normal tv. It was long but it was pretty good. Like Whiskey said it started off really good, then bumbled along reasonably well for the most part. Spectacular locations. Lea Seydoux is gorgeous, I had forgotten she was in it. A good cinema movie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nag said:

How did they manage to make Wonder Woman 1984 so shit?

Weirdly enough I haven't gotten around to watching it yet. I only saw an opening bit in a shopping mall, before I had to go out. That bad, eh?

 

On 09/10/2021 at 11:45, Nag said:

You can kill every single enemy in the early games no problem.

Indeed. Even killing Nemesis in every encounter is quite easy in the original RE3. Silent Hill has always been the one that punishes you for abusing ammo early on. Until Homecoming at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mmmark said:


Be a man and say that in the marvel thread. 🍿 

 

That would probably just confuse the situation.

 

2 hours ago, OCH said:

Weirdly enough I haven't gotten around to watching it yet. I only saw an opening bit in a shopping mall, before I had to go out. That bad, eh?

 

In my opinion yes, some of the effects just look trash and the biggest sin is that it's boring. Gal Gadot is stunning but even she can't save this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, OCH said:

Weirdly enough I haven't gotten around to watching it yet. I only saw an opening bit in a shopping mall, before I had to go out. That bad, eh?

 

It's really not good unfortunately, and I say as someone who was very much looking forward to it as I love the first one. I think it's worth a watch for some stuff though. One of her latest scenes might be written extremely poorly, but I enjoyed Wiig's take on Barbara. But if you really don't want to spend that much time with it, just make sure to watch the 10 minute opening scene, which is by far the best thing of the movie – and also available on youtube for some reason (though obviously not the best way to see it):

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

god that looks so cheap. I hope it's good, or reasonable at least, but it doesn't look like it's going to be

 

also, the antagonist has already been in the Sonic movie, and played a spectacularly miscast M. Bison in the Chun-Li film everyone's forgotten about

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Halloween Kills

Spoiler

is awful and so disappointing. A majority of it is crap characters and you end up rooting for Michael. Curtis is barely in it. The best line is from the funny kid of the last one and that’s only 5 seconds of a tv interview.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bond (not plot spoilers)

Spoiler

I didn't like it. I really like Craig as Bond and I'd put Casino Royale and Skyfall amongst my favourite blockbusters of the last 15 years. I think No Time To Dies biggest crime for me is that it felt a bit bland and washed out. The action wasn't particularly punchy or exciting, there was one action sequence I'd completely forgotten about whilst talking about the film over the credits with my friend. Rami Malik's villain was shit, seems like such a waste of a good actor. The plot was fine, bit daft compared to previous Craig Bond films (the names Bond, Craig Bond) felt like they where trying to take it back into the more outlandish Bond super villain stuff and I'm mostly okay with that. But the biggest crime for me is that it felt a bit and looked a bit boring.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saint Maud (Amazon Prime)

 

This had a limited cinema release last year, and is a critically acclaimed British horror movie set in Scarborough.

 

A nurse traumatized by an incident whilst working in a palliative care hospital takes an agency job looking after a cancer patient, and thinks she finds god.

 

It's more of a psychological drama than horror, albeit the last 15 mins or so definitely sways towards the latter (which actually then seems a bit jarring).

 

The problem is, as I find quite often with these critically acclaimed pieces (this was Mark Kermode's top film of 2020) is that I just didn't find it all that great - it was reasonably engaging (85 mins running time) but didn't really offer any twists or character depth to draw you in too much - so ultimately a bit average & ultimately forgettable.

 

Mark Kermode's 5 Star Review !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watched Dune yesterday. I really liked it. It might not be an instant classic but it’s very good. It looks and sounds amazing. It’s long (and very serious), but I was engaged to the end. Villeneuve obviously has a formula and Dune feels similar to Blade Runner 2047, so if you liked that (and I loved it), you’ll like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...